References

Fleming PS, Scott P, DiBiase AT. How to … manage the transition from functional to fixed appliances. J Orthod. 2007; 34:252-259 https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022311
Spary DJ, Little RA. The simple class II and class III corrector: three case reports. J Orthod. 2015; 42:69-75 https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000123
Ferro A. La terapia intercettiva della III classe scheletrica. Proposta di uno schema terapeutico [Interceptive treatment for skeletal class III. Proposal of a therapeutic scheme]. Arch Stomatol (Napoli). 1980; 21:329-346
De Clerck EE, Swennen GR. Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81:1010-1013 https://doi.org/10.2319/012311-47.1
Parkhouse R., 2nd edn. : Mosby Elsevier; 2009
Kesling PC. Dynamics of the Tip-edge bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96:16-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90224-2
Kim YH. Anterior openbite and its treatment with multiloop edgewise archwire. Angle Orthod. 1987; 57:290-321
, 3rd edn. In: Miloro M, Ghali G, Larsen P, Waite P (eds). : PMPH-USA; 2012
Wells AP, Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Long-term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76:915-922 https://doi.org/10.2319/091605-328
Keles A, Tokmak EC, Erverdi N, Nanda R. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72:387-396
Mandall AN, Cousley R, DiBiase A Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. J Orthod. 2012; 39:176-185 https://doi.org/10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000028
Ireland AJ, McDonald F.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003
Samuels RH, Jones ML. Orthodontic facebow injuries and safety equipment. Eur J Orthod. 1994; 16:385-394 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/16.5.385
BOS. Advice sheet: use of headgear and facebows. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/323kbxuu (accessed March 2022)
Hain MA, Longman LP, Field EA, Harrison JE. Natural rubber latex allergy: implications for the orthodontist. J Orthod. 2007; 34:6-11 https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722502186
BOS. Advice sheet: latex allergy in orthodontics. 2014. https://tinyurl.com/49awvvaf (accessed March 2022)

Use of Elastics in Orthodontics

From Volume 15, Issue 2, April 2022 | Pages 66-72

Authors

Jennifer Vesey

BDS, DDSc, MOrth RCSEd

Post-CCST Orthodontics, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool and Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral

Articles by Jennifer Vesey

Maria Dillon

BDS, MDSc, MOrth RCSEd

Post-CCST in Orthodontics, Halton General Hospital and Liverpool University Dental Hospital

Articles by Maria Dillon

Email Maria Dillon

Ian Edwards

BDS, MFDS, MPhil, MOrth

FTTA in Orthodontics, Birmingham Dental Hospital, St Chad's Queensway, B4 6NN, UK

Articles by Ian Edwards

Abstract

Intra-oral elastics are commonly used during orthodontic treatment and may be applied to several different clinical situations. They are useful for moving individual teeth, blocks of teeth and aiding growth modification. This article reviews the theory behind the use of intra-oral elastics and illustrates the theory with clinical examples.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Elastics are an essential adjunct to orthodontic treatment and have numerous clinical applications.

Article

There are many different types of elastomerics available in orthodontics with varied uses (Table 1). This article focuses on elastic bands, which are highly versatile and have many practical applications in contemporary orthodontic practice.

Elastics exert their effect by applying force to either a specific tooth or groups of teeth to create movement. The force required depends on the type of tooth movement desired, and the number of teeth in the anchorage unit. Across the industry there is a standardized method of description of the diameter and weight of each elastic so that comparisons of relative force may be made, (Figure 1).

The force level presented on the packaging by manufacturers is standardized, and represents the force applied by the elastic when it is stretched to three times its resting diameter. In theory, the correct size of elastic to use can be determined by measuring the distance between the points of application of the elastics and dividing by three. However, this is difficult to measure and unlikely to be precise clinically owing to the variable distances between attachments during treatment. A more precise method of measuring elastic force is with a stress–strain gauge between points of application.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available