References

Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30:386-395
Gkantidis N, Mistakidis I, Kouskoura T, Pandis N Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014; 42:1300-1319
Fleming PS Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement using surgical and non-surgical approaches. Evid Based Dent. 2014; 15:114-115
Frost HM The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hospital Med J. 1983; 31:3-9
Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res. 2001; 4:228-234
Harradine NW Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res. 2001; 4:220-227
Miles P Accelerated orthodontic treatment – what's the evidence?. Aust Dent J. 2017; 62:(Suppl 1)63-70
Čelar A, Schedlberger M, Dörfler P, Bertl M Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time. J Orofac Orthop. 2013; 74:40-51
Fleming PS, Johal A Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:575-584
Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 36:350-63
Dehbi H, Azaroual MF, Zaoui F Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: a systematic review. Int Orthod. 2017; 15:297-311
Yang X, He Y, Chen T Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials. J Orofac Orthop. 2017; 78:121-128
Yang X, Xue C, He Y, Zhao M, Luo M, Wang P, Bai D Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : a quantitative systematic review. J Orofac Orthop. 2018; 79:1-10
Penning EW, Peerlings RHJ, Govers JDM Orthodontics with customized versus noncustomized appliances: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2017; 96:1498-1504
Jing D, Xiao J, Li X, Li Y, Zhao Z The effectiveness of vibrational stimulus to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17
DiBiase AT, Woodhouse NR, Papageorgiou SN Effect of supplemental vibrational force on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150:918-927
DiBiase AT, Woodhouse NR, Papageorgiou SN Effects of supplemental vibrational force on space closure, treatment duration, and occlusal outcome: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153:469-480.e4
Katchooi M, Cohanim B, Tai S Effect of supplemental vibration on orthodontic treatment with aligners: a randomized trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153:336-346
Makrygiannakis MA, Kaklamanos EG, Athanasiou AE Effects of systemic medication on root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of animal studies. Eur J Orthod. 2019; 8:(41)346-359
Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 35:117-20
Arumughan S, Somaiah S, Muddaiah S A comparison of the rate of retraction with low-level laser therapy and conventional retraction technique. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018; 9:260-266
Imani MM, Golshah A, Safari-Faramani R, Sadeghi M Effect of low-level laser therapy on orthodontic movement of human canine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Acta Inform Med. 2018; 26:139-143
Showkatbakhsh R, Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh M The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the acceleration of tooth movement. World J Orthod. 2010; 11:e52-56
Hoffmann S, Papadopoulos N, Visel D Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. J Orofac Orthop. 2017; 78:301-311
Viwattanatipa N, Charnchairerk S The effectiveness of corticotomy and piezocision on canine retraction: a systematic review. Korean J Orthod. 2018; 48:200-211
Kole H Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1959; 12:515-29
Gil APS, Haas OL, Méndez-Manjón I Alveolar corticotomies for accelerated orthodontics: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018; 46:438-445
Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2016; 17
Liou EJ, Polley JW, Figueroa AA Distraction osteogenesis: the effects of orthodontic tooth movement on distracted mandibular bone. J Craniofac Surg. 1998; 9:564-571
Sukurica Y, Karaman A, Gürel HG, Dolanmaz D Rapid canine distalization through segmental alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:226-336
Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, Nanda R ‘Surgery first’ skeletal Class III correction using the skeletal anchorage system. J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43:97-105
Wei H, Liu Z, Zang J, Wang X Surgery-first/early-orthognathic approach may yield poorer postoperative stability than conventional orthodontics-first approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 126:107-116
El-Angbawi A, McIntyre GT, Fleming PS, Bearn DR Non-surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 18:(2015)
Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015
Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153:771-785
Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019; 89:183-189
Attri S, Mittal R, Batra P Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations: a randomised controlled trial. J Orthod. 2018; 45:225-233
Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144:639-648
Diravidamani K, Sivalingam SK, Agarwal V Drugs influencing orthodontic tooth movement: an overall review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012; 4:(Suppl 2)
Fernández-González FJ, Cañigral A, Balbontín-Ayala F Experimental evidence of pharmacological management of anchorage in orthodontics: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015; 20:58-65
Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z The effect of drugs on orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006; 9:163-171
Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M, Yañez-Vico RM Effectiveness of biology-based methods for inhibiting orthodontic tooth movement. A systematic review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017; 41:494-502
Bartzela T, Türp JC, Motschall E, Maltha JC Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:16-26

Non-conventional methods for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. A contemporary overview

From Volume 14, Issue 2, April 2021 | Pages 90-96

Abstract

In today's fast-paced world, reducing the duration of orthodontic treatment has become a priority for patients seeking treatment. There are now several approaches and devices available that are reported to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and, fortunately, there has been an increase in the amount of research in this area in recent times.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the different non-conventional methods that can be used to accelerate OTM, and to discuss their effectiveness, as well as their potential shortcomings.

Article

Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances can be a lengthy process. Comprehensive treatment takes from 24 to 36 months, on average, and duration of treatment is one of the main concerns for patients.1 Approaches to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) are, therefore, welcomed by orthodontists and patients alike. Numerous techniques have evolved over time. Some aim to reduce the treatment duration by accelerating the velocity of OTM, whereas other methods aim to make the mechanical force delivery system more efficient.

Figure 1 illustrates the available surgical and non-surgical methods for accelerating OTM. Surgical techniques on the whole, aim to facilitate tooth movement by inducing a regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP).2,3 Regional acceleratory phenomenon, as described by Harold Frost (1983), is a tissue reaction to noxious stimuli that increases healing capacity.4 However, the use of surgical approaches is limited given the invasiveness of some techniques and the low quality of evidence to support their use. In light of this, the majority of research has focused on non-surgical approaches, which can be further subdivided into physical, biological and/or mechanical methods.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available