References

Dacre JT. The long term effects of one lower incisor extraction. Eur J Orthod. 1985; 7:136-144
Livas C, Jongsma AC, Ren Y. Enamel reduction techniques in orthodontics: a literature review. Open Dent J. 2013; 7:146-151
Chudasama D, Sheridan JJ. Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod. 2007; 41:315-320
Sheridan JJ, Ledoux PM. Air-rotor stripping and proximal sealants. An SEM evaluation. J Clin Orthod. 1989; 23:790-794
Barros SEC, Janson G, Torres FC Class I malocclusion treatment: Influence of a missing mandibular incisor on anterior guidance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010; 138:109-117
Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999; 21:517-522
Ziahosseini P, Hussain F, Millar BJ. Management of gingival black triangles. Br Dent J. 2014; 217:559-563
Pithon MM, Santos AM, Couto FS Comparative evaluation of esthetic perception of black spaces in patients with mandibular incisor extraction. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82:806-811
Uribe F, Holliday B, Nanda R. Incidence of open gingival embrasures after mandibular incisor extractions: a clinical photographic evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011; 139:49-54
Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1992; 54:103-116
Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34:681-685
Little RM. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod. 1999; 5:191-204
Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2016:(1)
Valinoti JR. Mandibular incisor extraction therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994; 105:107-116

Management of lower incisor extraction cases. Part 2: problems and solutions when choosing extraction

From Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2022 | Pages 7-10

Authors

John Scholey

BDS, FDS RCS (Edin), FDS (Orth) RCS (Edin), MOrth RCS (Edin), MOrth RCS (Eng), MDentSci

Consultant Orthodontist, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

Articles by John Scholey

Email John Scholey

Semina Visram

BDS, MJDF (Eng), MClinDent, MOrth RCS (Eng), FDS (Orth) RCS (Eng)

Consultant Orthodontist, Birmingham Dental Hospital, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Articles by Semina Visram

Yatisha A Patel

BDS, MOrth RCS (Edin), MSc

Post CCST in Orthodontics, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

Articles by Yatisha A Patel

Abstract

In part one of this series we described situations where extracting a lower incisor could provide a useful alternative to premolar extractions, in addition to solutions for treatment planning certain types of cases. In part two, we look at some of the problems caused by opting to extract a lower incisor and how they may be overcome.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Part two of this series aims to guide clinicians on potential pitfalls of lower incisor extraction treatment plans and how these can be avoided.

Article

Extraction of a lower incisor results in loss of 5–7 mm of tooth tissue from the lower arch. This reduces the intercanine width and, therefore, affects the radial fit of the upper teeth around the remaining lower teeth. With normally proportioned upper anterior teeth, this will lead to an increased overbite and overjet,1 unless steps are taken to reduce the upper labial segment width, or increase that of the lower incisors. Alternatively, a compromise in vertical and horizontal overlap can be accepted by the clinician and patient.

In Class II cases, particularly where there is already a deep bite, any residual space after relieving crowding may result in the lower incisors retroclining further, with a concomitant increase in both overbite and overjet. The commonly used MBT prescription has a -6° torque in the lower incisors, which will result in lingual crown torque of the lower incisors and can compound a Class II incisor relationship.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available