References

Chung CK, Kerr WJ. Interceptive orthodontics: application and outcome in a demand population. Br Dent J. 1987; 162:73-76 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806029
O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod. 1993; 20:25-35 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.1.25
Sutton F, Ellituv ZN, Seed R. A survey of self-perceived educational needs of general dental practitioners in the Merseyside region. Prim Dent Care. 2005; 12:78-82 https://doi.org/10.1308/1355761054348468
Derringer KA. Undergraduate orthodontic teaching in UK dental schools. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:224-232 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812615
Derringer KA. Undergraduate orthodontic assessment and examination in UK dental schools. Br Dent J. 2006; 201:225-229 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813884
Karaiskos N, Wiltshire WA, Odlum O, Brothwell D, Hassard TH. Preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment needs of an inner-city group of 6- and 9-year-old Canadian children. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005; 71
Väkiparta MK, Kerosuo HM, Nyström ME, Heikinheimo KA. Orthodontic treatment need from eight to 12 years of age in an early treatment oriented public health care system: a prospective study. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:344-349 https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[344:OTNFET]2.0.CO;2
Mirabelli JT, Huang GJ, Siu CH The effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in a Medicaid population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127:592-598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.016
Theis JE, Huang GJ, King GJ, Omnell ML. Eligibility for publicly funded orthodontic treatment determined by the handicapping labiolingual deviation index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128:708-7015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.10.012
Wahl N. Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 1: Antiquity to the mid-19th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127:255-259 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.013
Asbell MB. A brief history of orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98:206-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81597-5
Casto F. A historical sketch of orthodontia. Dent Cosmos. 1934; 76:111-135
Denton GB. The foundation of dental literature and of the dental branches in the eighteenth century. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972; 84:1336-1348 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1972.0252
Weinberger BW. Early dental literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1938; 26:222-247
McKinstry RE. Cleft Palate Dentistry.St Petersburg, FL: ABI Professional Publications; 1998
Kjellgren B. Serial extraction as a corrective procedure in dental orthopedic therapy. Acta Odontol Scand. 1948; 8:17-43 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016354809014459
Dewel B. Predecessors of serial extraction: By Filip Palsson. Odontol. Rev. 1956; 7:118-135
Graber TM. Serial extraction: a continuous diagnostic and decisional process. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60:541-575 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90197-7
Hotz RP. Guidance of eruption versus serial extraction. Am J Orthod. 1970; 58:1-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(70)90125-9
Buchner H. Root resorption caused by ectopic eruption of maxillary cuspid. Int J Orthodont Oral Surg. 1936; 22:1236-1238
Howard RD. Impacted tooth position: unexpected improvements. Br J Orthod. 1978; 5:87-92 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.5.2.87
Silling G, Keller JG, Feingold M. Retained primary teeth: their effect on developing occlusions. ASDC J Dent Child. 1979; 46:296-299
Moore AW. Observations on facial growth and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod. 1959; 45:399-423
Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthodont. 1960; 30:103-133
Norman F. Serial extraction. Angle Orthod. 1965; 35:149-157 https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1965)035<0149:SE>2.0.CO;2
Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics.St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1966
Kettle M. Treatment of the unerupted maxillary canine. Trans Br Soc Orthod. 1957; 18:74-84
Williams BH. Diagnosis and prevention of maxillary cuspid impaction. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0030:DAPOMC>2.0.CO;2
Resh GD. Diagnosis and prevention of maxillary cuspid impaction. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2005; 16:29-34
Leivesley WD. Minimizing the problem of impacted and ectopic canines. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984; 51:367-370
Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur J Orthod. 1988; 10:283-295 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/10.4.283
Lewis M, Shilton P, Fuqua RW. Parental control of nocturnal thumbsucking. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1981; 12:87-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(81)90036-7
Borrie FR, Bearn DR, Innes NP, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Interventions for the cessation of non-nutritive sucking habits in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008694.pub2
Power SM, Short MB. An investigation into the response of palatally displaced canines to the removal of deciduous canines and an assessment of factors contributing to favourable eruption. Br J Orthod. 1993; 20:215-223 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.3.215
Leonardi M, Armi P, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines: a prospective longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:581-586 https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0581:TIATPD>2.0.CO;2
Baccetti T, Leonardi M, Armi P. A randomized clinical study of two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30:381-385 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn023
Ngan P, Alkire RG, Fields H Management of space problems in the primary and mixed dentitions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130:1330-1339 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0403
Viglianisi A. Effects of lingual arch used as space maintainer on mandibular arch dimension: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138:382.e1-382.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.026
Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod. 1984; 6:25-34 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/6.1.25
Kurol J, Berglund L. Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition. Eur J Orthod. 1992; 14:173-179 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.3.173
O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:234-243 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889540603003524
O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:488-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889540603006425
Ngan P. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: is it worth the burden?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:S82-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.017
Mandall N, DiBiase A, Littlewood S Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 15-month follow-up. J Orthod. 2010; 37:149-161 https://doi.org/10.1179/14653121043056

History of interceptive orthodontics

From Volume 14, Issue 3, July 2021 | Pages 163-167

Authors

Alan Tsipkis

DDS

Orthodontic Registrar, Eastman Dental Hospital, London

Articles by Alan Tsipkis

Abstract

Interceptive orthodontics refers to all interventions and treatments that can be performed during the primary or mixed dentition with the aim of eliminating or minimizing dento-alveolar and skeletal disharmonies that can interfere with the normal growth and development of occlusion, function, aesthetics and the psychological wellbeing of children. The main purpose of interceptive orthodontics is to prepare an environment that will not interfere with the occlusal development in order to reduce the future need for prolonged complex mechanical orthodontic treatment. According to the American Association of Orthodontics the most suitable age for screening the paediatric population for interceptive intervention is 7 years of age.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: To review the progress made in the field of interceptive orthodontics and discuss the current principles of early orthodontic intervention.

Article

The role of the general dental practitioner is crucial in identifying any problems or abnormalities in the developing dentition early as they are the first to see the patients. It is estimated that 15% of malocclusions can be corrected and future complications prevented with relatively simple, early interceptive means in the developing dentition.1 One-third of British children are in need of interceptive treatment, but only 20% of those children receive it.2,3 The main reasons for this are irregular dental attendance and GDP-related factors.4 One-third of the GDPs in the UK fail to identify, treat or refer developing malocclusion at the optimal time. The reasons behind this seem to be a lack of clinical expertise and training, combined with a high work load.5 This failure is in spite of the fact that knowledge and competency in providing interceptive orthodontic treatment are essential learning outcomes in the General Dental Council (GDC) curriculum for dental students.6,7

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available