References

O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomised, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:234-243
Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison J, Worthington H, O'Brien K. Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion reduces the chance of incisal trauma: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148:47-59
Jadbinder S, Fleming PS, Newton T, DiBiase AT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011; 138:247-256
Spary DJ, Little RA. The simple Class II and Class III corrector: three case reports. J Orthod. 2015; 42:69-75
Little R, Spary DJ. A novel way of correcting Class II buccal segment occlusions. Ortho Update. 2014; 7:94-98
Proffit WR., 2nd edn. Missouri: Mosby; 1993
(Internet) Queen's Hospital Burton Upon Trent. c.2015. http://burtonortho.co.uk/documents-h-z/ (cited 21 March 2017)

Early treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions

From Volume 11, Issue 4, October 2018 | Pages 141-143

Authors

Shayma Witwit

BDS, MJDF

Dental Core Trainee in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, UK

Articles by Shayma Witwit

David John Spary

BDS, LDS RCS, FDS RCPS DOrth

Orthodontic Consultant, Queen's Hospital, Burton upon Trent, UK

Articles by David John Spary

Abstract

The early orthodontic management of a severe Class II division 1 malocclusion and its advantages are discussed. Two cases are described, both of which were successfully treated on a non-extraction basis, with a phase of functional appliance therapy followed by fixed appliances.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The article outlines how, with careful case selection and early treatment, severe overjets can be successfully treated with orthodontics alone.

Article

The treatment of children with severe Class II division 1 malocclusions presents a dilemma to the orthodontist. It is now believed that orthodontic appliances have a clinically significant effect in promoting forward mandibular growth.1 If the malocclusion is so severe that mandibular advancement surgery is a likely outcome, would early orthodontic treatment be putting the child through unnecessary therapy and complicating later treatment by reducing the overjet?

However, early treatment would seem to have some proven benefits such as the reduction of the risk of trauma to the anterior teeth2 and reduction of bullying during the period until the patient was old enough to have surgery.3 Providing teeth have not been extracted, the possibility of increasing the overjet and carrying out mandibular advancement surgery would still be an option.

Two cases are described where a very large overjet (over 15 mm) was successfully reduced without the need for extraction. The treatment involved a functional appliance phase using the simple Class II corrector (Button and Bead appliance), as described by Spary and Little,4 followed by fixed appliances. The conversion to fixed appliances can be a problem if pre-adjusted edgewise appliances, like the Straight-Wire Appliance®, are used. This is because the upper teeth are tipped distally during the functional appliance treatment, so that they will tend to move forwards as the upper teeth are aligned. Using Begg or Tip-Edge® brackets in the upper jaw prevents this proclination and the teeth can be uprighted later when anchorage can be supported by Class II elastics. This technique has been described by Little and Spary.5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available