References

Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of third molar impaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016; 95:267-276 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515615857
Manne R, Gandikota C, Juvvadi SR Impacted canines: etiology, diagnosis, and orthodontic management. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012; 4:S234-238 https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100216
Moyers R. Handbook of Orthodontics, 4th edn. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc; 1963
Jacoby H. The etiology of maxillary canine impactions. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84:125-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90176-8
Becker A. Etiology of maxillary canine impactions. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86:437-438 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90038-1
Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64:249-256
Andreasen J, Petersen J, Laskin D. Textbook and Color Atlas of Tooth Impactions.Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1997
Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res. 1973; 81:12-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb01489.x
Scott JK, Atack NE. The developing occlusion of children and young people in general practice: when to watch and when to refer. Br Dent J. 2015; 218:151-156 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.54
Gron AM. Prediction of tooth emergence. J Dent Res. 1962; 41:573-85 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345620410030801
Becker A. The Orthodontic Treatment of Impacted Teeth, 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012
Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim. 1970; 66:103-170
Suri L, Gagari E, Vastardis H. Delayed tooth eruption: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. A literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:432-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.031
Tay F, Pang A, Yuen S. Unerupted maxillary anterior supernumerary teeth: report of 204 cases. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984; 51:289-294
Standerwick R. A possible etiology for the dilaceration and flexion of permanent tooth roots relative to bone remodelling gradients in alveolar bone. Dent Hypotheses. 2014; 5:7-10
SEDENTEXCT project.Radiation protection. No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (evidence based guidelines). https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/172.pdf (accessed September 2022)
Brearley LJ, McKibben DH Ankylosis of primary molar teeth. I. Prevalence and characteristics. ASDC J Dent Child. 1973; 40:54-63

Delayed biological tooth eruption and eruptive potential: a case series

From Volume 15, Issue 4, October 2022 | Pages 207-212

Authors

Saskia Schwabe

BDS

Postgraduate student in Orthodontics, University Dental Hospital Manchester

Articles by Saskia Schwabe

Email Saskia Schwabe

Abstract

Delayed eruption is a commonly encountered problem and its management poses an orthodontic challenge that should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The stage of root development, root morphology and degree of ectopia, as well the patient's age and any relevant medical history, are essential in determining the prognosis for spontaneous eruption. This case series demonstrates three cases where spontaneous eruption was unexpected, owing to various factors. These cases highlight the importance of removal of occlusal obstructions and an observation period to allow for improvement in position of an unerupted tooth before definitive treatment decisions are made.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Determining the potential for future spontaneous eruption, or improvement in position, can minimize the need for prolonged orthodontic management or potential prosthetic replacement.

Article

Eruption is the process of a tooth moving occlusally from its developing position within the alveolar bone, through the oral mucosa, to a functioning position within the oral cavity. Various factors may cause disturbances in the process of eruption.

The terms impacted, ectopic, and impeded are often erroneously used interchangeably. An impacted tooth refers to one that cannot erupt owing to a space deficiency within the arch. This may present alongside the ectopic position of the developing tooth germ. An ectopic tooth refers to one that is malpositioned and may be unerupted and impacted, or emerge in an aberrant position. An impeded tooth, on the other hand, is one that has developed in the correct position with sufficient space within the arch, but its eruption is blocked by the presence of an obstacle, such as a supernumerary or retained deciduous tooth.

Unerupted teeth are a common finding within any new orthodontic patient clinic, with third permanent molars being the most frequently impacted tooth in 24.4% of the population worldwide.1

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available