References

Schwarz AM Tissue changes incident to orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Orthod. 1932; 18:331-352
Bridges T, King G, Mohammed A The effect of age on tooth movement and mineral density in the alveolar tissues of the rat. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93:(3)245-250
Owman-Moll P, Kurol J, Lundgren D The effects of a four-fold increased orthodontic force magnitude on tooth movement and root resorptions. An intra-individual study in adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18:(3)287-294
Chan E, Darendeliler MA Physical properties of root cementum: Part 5. Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of light and heavy orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127:(2)186-195
Proffit WR, 5th edn.. St Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Mosby; 2013
Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. The Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:(1)86-92
Roberts-Harry D, Sandy J Orthodontics. Part 11: Orthodontic tooth movement. Br Dent J. 2004; 196:(7)391-394; quiz 426
Quinn RS, Yoshikawa DK A reassessment of force magnitude in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88:(3)252-260
Hixon EH, Aasen TO, Clark RA, Klosterman R, Miller SS, Odom WM On force and tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1970; 57:(5)476-478
Jepsen A Root surface measurement and a method for x-ray determination of root surface area. Acta Odont Scand. 1963; 21:35-46
Mathews DP, Kokich VG Managing treatment for the orthodontic patient with periodontal problems. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3:(1)21-38
Sheridan JJ, Ledoux PM Air-rotor stripping and proximal sealants. An SEM evaluation. J Clin Orthod. 1989; 23:(12)790-794
Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM, Harding WJ Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:(2)230-238
Stucki N, Ingervall B The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Europ J Orthod. 1998; 20:(3)271-81
Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update. 1998; 25:(7)302-308
Clark WJ The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93:(1)1-18
O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:(2)128-137
O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:(5)488-494
Osborn WS, Nanda RS, Currier GF Mandibular arch perimeter changes with lip bumper treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 99:(6)527-532
Nance HN The limitations of orthodontic treatment; diagnosis and treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod. 1947; 33:(5)253-301
Ismail SF, Johal AS The role of implants in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2002; 29:(3)239-245
Block MS, Hoffman DR A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107:(3)251-258
Schatzle M, Mannchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:(12)1351-1359
Jenner JD, Fitzpatrick BN Skeletal anchorage utilising bone plates. Aust Orthod J. 1985; 9:(2)231-233
Tsui WK, Chua HD, Cheung LK Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41:(11)1427-1438
Hung E, Oliver D, Kim KB, Kyung HM, Buschang PH Effects of pilot hole size and bone density on miniscrew implants' stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010; 14:(3)454-460
Barros SE, Janson G, Chiqueto K, Garib DG, Janson M Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:(4)e181-92
Jambi S, Walsh T, Sandler J, Benson PE, Skeggs RM, O'Brien KD Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 8
Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R, Speight P, O'Brien K Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: a 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146:(1)10-20
Campbell KM, Casas MJ, Kenny DJ Ankylosis of traumatized permanent incisors: pathogenesis and current approaches to diagnosis and management. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005; 71:(10)763-768
Chugh T, Ganeshkar SV, Revankar AV, Jain AK Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2013; 14
Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yabuuchi T, Ando R, Roberts WE, Garetto LP Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(6)889-897
Ricketts RM Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs. Part II. Am J Orthod. 1976; 70:(4)359-397
Zablocki HL, McNamara JA, Franchi L, Baccetti T Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(6)852-860
Radkowski MJ The influence of the transpalatal arch on orthodontic anchorage. Thesis abstract from St Louis University. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132
Roberts-Harry DP, Harradine NW A sectional approach to the alignment of ectopic maxillary canines. Br J Orthod. 1995; 22:(1)67-70
Rebellato J, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Isaacson RJ, Davidovitch M, Vroom K Lower arch perimeter preservation using the lingual arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112:(4)449-456
Stivaros N, Lowe C, Dandy N, Doherty B, Mandall NA A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch. Europ J Orthod. 2009; 32:(2)171-176
Samuels RH, Willner F, Knox J, Jones ML A national survey of orthodontic facebow injuries in the UK and Eire. Br J Orthod. 1996; 23:(1)11-20
Cetlin NM, Ten Hoeve A Nonextraction treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1983; 17:(6)396-413
Brandao M, Pinho HS, Urias D Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:(2)239-244
Patel MP, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Pinzan A, Janson G, de Freitas MR Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics. Dent Press J Orthod. 2013; 18:(6)58-64
Jambi S, Thiruvenkatachari B, O'Brien KD, Walsh T Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 10
Bjōrk A Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odont Scand. 1955; 13:(1)9-34
Hoggan BR, Sadowsky C The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119:(5)482-488
Christou P, Kiliaridis S Vertical growth-related changes in the positions of palatal rugae and maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(1)81-86
Taneva EDChicago: University of Illinois; 2014

The control of unwanted tooth movement — an overview of orthodontic anchorage

From Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2015 | Pages 42-54

Authors

Hywel J Naish

BSc, BDS, MFDS RCS(Ed), MOrth RCS(Ed)

Specialist Practitioner, Cathedral Orthodontics, Cardiff, CF11 9LN

Articles by Hywel J Naish

Claire Dunbar

BDS, MJDF RCS(Eng), MSc, MOrth RCS(Ed)

Senior Registrar, Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester and School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol

Articles by Claire Dunbar

Nikki E Atack

BDS, MSc, MOrth RCS, FDS RCS

Consultant Orthodontist, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol

Articles by Nikki E Atack

Julie C Williams

BDS, MFGDP, DPDS MA (Ethics of Healthcare)

StR in Orthodontics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Yeovil District Hospital and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Articles by Julie C Williams

Jonathan R Sandy

PhD, MSc, BDS, FDS MOrth, FMedSci

Professor in Orthodontics, Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol

Articles by Jonathan R Sandy

Abstract

The success of orthodontic treatment relies upon careful treatment planning, for both desired and unwanted tooth movement. The theory behind anchorage reinforcement will be considered and the current means of anchorage support and creation will be described. Methods by which the orthodontist can reduce anchorage demand and measure anchorage loss will also be discussed.

Clinical Relevance: To understand the clinical applications of the theory of unwanted orthodontic tooth movement and be able to give examples of planned means of increasing anchorage and decreasing anchorage demands.

Article

In order for teeth to undergo planned orthodontic movement it is necessary to apply an appropriate force to the tooth or teeth and for this force to be resisted, either entirely or partially. An understanding of this process is an essential part of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Before exploring anchorage in orthodontics it is worth considering the basic principle as to why resistance is required for force application to be effective in achieving the desired tooth movement. Following Newton's third law, it is well known that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that forces act not only on the teeth to be moved, but also elsewhere to the same extent, often reciprocally, upon other teeth which are referred to as the anchor units. It is when these reciprocal forces are not managed adequately that unwanted tooth movements may occur, leading to a poor occlusal finish or insufficient orthodontic correction of the initial problem, such as increased overjet.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available