References

Wiesenfeld D, Ferguson MM, Mitchell DN, MacDonald DG, Scully C, Cochran K, Russell RI. Orofacial granulomatosis – a clinical and pathological analysis. Q J Med. 1985; 54:101-113
Campbell H, Escudier M, Patel P, Nunes C, Elliot TR, Barnard K Distinguishing orofacial granulomatosis from Crohn's disease: two separate disease entities?. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011; 17:2109-2115
Gibson J, Wray D. Human leucocyte antigen typing in orofacial granulomatosis. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 143:1119-1121
James J, Patton DW, Lewis CJ, Kirkwood EM, Ferguson MM. Oro-facial granulomatosis and clinical atopy. J Oral Med. 1986; 41:29-30
Campbell H, Escudier M, Patel P, Challacombe SJ, Sanderson JD, Lomer MC Review article: cinnamon- and benzoate-free diet as a primary treatment for orofacial granulomatosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34:687-701
Guttman-Yassky E, Weltfriend S, Bergman R. Resolution of orofacial granulomatosis with amalgam removal. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003; 17:344-347
Ellison R, Green C, Gibson J, Ghaffar S. Orofacial granulomatosis related to amalgam fillings. Scott Med J. 2013; 58:e24-e25
Saalman R, Mattsson U, Jontell M. Orofacial granulomatosis in childhood – a clinical entity that may indicate Crohn's disease as well as food allergy. Acta Paediatr. 2009; 98:1162-1167
Sainsbury CP, Dodge JA, Walker DM, Aldred MJ. Orofacial granulomatosis in childhood. Br Dent J. 1987; 163:154-157
Noble J, Ahing SI, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. Nickel allergy and orthodontics, a review and report of two cases. Br Dent J. 2008; 204:297-300
Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Byrialsen K, Menné T. Release of nickel ions from stainless steel alloys used in dental braces and their patch test reactivity in nickel-sensitive individuals. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48:300-304
Bourke J, Coulson I, English J. Guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis: an update. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 160:946-954

Orofacial Granulomatosis in an Orthodontic Patient: a Case Report

From Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2019 | Pages 25-28

Authors

Aman Ulhaq

BDS, MFDS, MSc, MOrth, FDOrth

Consultant in Orthodontics, Edinburgh Dental Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Articles by Aman Ulhaq

Katy Tidbury

BDS, MFDS RCS(Ed)

Specialty Registrar in Orthodontics, King's College Dental Institute, Bessemer Road, Camberwell, London SE5 9RW, UK

Articles by Katy Tidbury

Abstract

A case is presented of a 14-year-old male patient being treated with a fixed orthodontic appliance who presented with a persistent upper lip swelling. The patient was experiencing discomfort from the appliance and the appliance was debonded. A diagnosis of orofacial granulomatosis was established and the patient was managed carefully with a cinnamon- and benzoate-free diet leading to resolution of the swelling. Orofacial granulomatosis is a rare condition and its presentation, diagnosis, and management are discussed.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Orthodontists should be aware of the presentation of orofacial granulomatosis and the possible challenges associated with managing these patients.

Article

Aman Ulhaq

Orofacial granulomatosis (OFG) is an uncommon chronic granulomatous inflammatory condition affecting the lips, face and oral mucosa in the absence of any recognized systemic condition.1 Swelling of the oral tissues is the most common presentation; erythema, cobblestoning, mucosal tags, ulceration, fissures and nodules may also be evident.2 The presence of long-standing disease may lead to the development of mucosal scarring. Histologically, OFG is characterized by non-caseating granulomas with multinucleated giant cells of macrophage origin, and oedema of the tissues.

The aetiology of OFG remains unclear with several theories having been postulated. Weak evidence exists for a genetic aetiology, as certain Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) alleles are more common in OFG patients than in the general population.3 An association with food intolerances and a history of atopy are also linked with this condition. A previous study has illustrated that up to 60% of patients with OFG were atopic, showing IgE reactions to common allergens.4 Food substances may be causative, or lead to the precipitation of the disease process. Common sensitivities include: benzoic acid, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamon, benzoates and chocolate.5 These can be found in foods which form part of a regular diet and may also be ‘hidden’ when used as food additives and labelled as ‘E-numbers’.

Dental materials have also been suggested as being causative of OFG.6,7 Orthodontists should be aware of the presentation of OFG and the possible challenges associated with managing these patients. The aim of this article is to present a case report of a young male patient who suffered with OFG associated with food sensitivity.

Case report

A 14-year-old male was transferred to the Orthodontic department at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, from another hospital unit due to his family relocating. He was already undergoing fixed appliance orthodontic therapy to camouflage his Class II division 1 malocclusion (Figures 1a–f). He had extractions of upper first premolars and lower second premolars to aid with overjet reduction, relief of crowding, correction of molar relationship and dental centrelines.

Figure 1. (a–f) Patient presenting with Class II division 1 malocclusion.

Four months into his treatment he developed persistent swelling of his upper lip (Figure 2a, b). There was also some crusting and scab formation on the upper lip. This continued without improvement and an incisional biopsy was performed. The histology showed the presence of chronic inflammation, a finding that could indicate a number of disease processes, including OFG. The possibility of a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to nickel was considered as the scabbed area was in contact with the upper appliance and so nickel-titanium archwires were removed and replaced with stainless steel archwires. There was no improvement and, with continued discomfort and swelling of the upper lip, the appliance was debonded (Figures 3a–c). Although symptoms improved slightly after removal of the appliance, there was no resolution of the lesion. A referral was made to an Oral Medicine clinic for further investigation.

Figure 2. (a, b) Patient presenting with upper lip swelling.
Figure 3. (a) Debond left buccal; (b) debond right buccal; (c) front occlusion.

The diagnosis from the Oral Medicine clinic was infective exfoliative cheilitis superimposed on OFG. The management included a swab of the scabbed lesion which demonstrated infection with candida and coliform organisms. Antifungal and antibiotic agents were prescribed to treat the superimposed infection. A cinnamon-free and benzoate-free diet, and elimination of chocolate, was undertaken by the patient under the guidance of a dietitian. This continued for 12 weeks and when the patient attended for a review at the joint Oral Medicine–Gastroenterology clinic the upper lip swelling had resolved (Figures 4a, b). He has remained symptom free and continues to avoid the causative dietary agents. The patient has decided to delay any further orthodontic treatment, and his treatment will be reconsidered at a later stage.

Figure 4. (a, b) Resolution of lip swelling 12 weeks after specialized diet.

Discussion

Orofacial granulomatosis is mainly present in young adults; a cohort that is likely to be seen by orthodontists. These patients may present with numerous oral symptoms, thus making it important for clinicians to understand the nature of the condition. Orthodontists may be the first to see the signs and symptoms of the condition and hence they will be required to make an appropriate onward referral to a physician. OFG may be indicative of progression to, or exist concurrently with, Crohn's Disease (CD). Furthermore, some authors suggest that specifically the childhood onset of OFG may be predictive of progression to CD,8,9 although this has been contradicted in another group.2 Other conditions, such as sarcoidosis and tuberculosis, have also been associated with OFG. A thorough family and medical history is required in order to ascertain or eliminate any suggestion that there may be underlying systemic disease linked to the condition.

Orthodontic patients who have had OFG identified in their medical history before the onset of treatment will need careful assessment of whether they will be able to tolerate fixed appliances (Figure 5). A sectional appliance may be used to test the tolerance of the appliance and, if successful, this can progress to a complete fixed appliance. As expected, each case should be treated on an individual basis.

Figure 5. Sectional fixed orthodontic appliance.

Alternative treatment modalities may also be considered for those patients who are unable to tolerate conventional labial fixed appliances. The use of aligners for mild malocclusions may be considered, if appropriate. For patients who require growth modification, the wireless ‘Newport’ Twin Block appliance may be the appliance of choice (Figures 6a–c). The absence of any components that are likely to traumatize already irritable sites may allow these types of appliances to be better tolerated. Functional appliances can also be modified in order to prevent excessive irritation of the lips and affected mucosa, and due care should be given to components around the affected mucosa when designing the appliance.

Figure 6. (a–c) ‘Newport’ Twin Block appliance for Class II correction.

Difficulties with wearing fixed appliances may also arise for orthodontic patients developing OFG during treatment. Symptoms of OFG may be similar to a Type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction to nickel, although this is likely to present within weeks of commencing orthodontic treatment.10 A Type IV hypersensitivity reaction should be included in the differential diagnosis of upper lip swelling, but there are differences in the epidemiology and presentation of the two conditions (Table 1). In this case, nickel-titanium archwires were replaced with stainless steel ones. Although stainless steel contains nickel, it is thought that there is less nickel released from this alloy.11 Ideally, titanium molybdenum alloy would be the preferred choice if nickel allergy was suspected.


OFG Nickel allergy
Age of patient Young adults Adolescence to adulthood
Gender F = M F > M
Onset of symptoms Can occur at any stage Within weeks of treatment
Site commonly affected Most commonly upper lip Oral mucosa
Signs and symptoms Swelling Erythema
Erythema Gingival hyperplasia
Cobblestoning Burning mouth

Patch testing may be carried out by a dermatologist if sensitivity to a dental material is suspected. The British Contact Dermatitis Society recommended standard series would include nickel testing, however it would not rule out other common dental materials.12 Patch testing for food additives may not accurately predict dietary outcome.5 Elimination of cinnamon and benzoates in the diet led to a complete resolution of OFG in this case. However, any attempt to do so should be done with consultation from a physician or dietitian.

Conclusion

Orofacial granulomatosis is an uncommon condition that often presents as a persistent lip swelling and may be seen in young patients.

A thorough medical history and appropriate referral is required in order to ensure correct diagnosis, and to rule out any systemic disease that may be associated with this condition.

Patients with OFG may find it difficult to tolerate orthodontic appliances and careful assessment and management is required.