References

Kurol J, Thilander B Infraocclusion of primary molars and the effect on occlusal development, a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod. 1984; 6:277-93 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/6.4.277
Kurol J Infraocclusion of primary molars: an epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981; 9:94-102 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb01037.x
Steigman S, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E, Matrai Y Submerged deciduous molars in preschool children: an epidemiologic survey. J Dent Res. 1973; 52:322-326 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520022201
Bjerklin K, Bennett J The long-term survival of lower second primary molars in subjects with agenesis of the premolars. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22:245-255 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.3.245
Biederman W The problem of the ankylosed tooth. Dent Clin North Am. 1968; 409-424
Via WF Submerged deciduous molars: familial tendencies. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964; 69:127-129 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0258
Kurol J, Magnusson BC Infraocclusion of primary molars: a histologic study. Scand J Dent Res. 1984; 92:564-576 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb01298.x
Bjerklin K, Kurol J, Valentin J Ectopic eruption of maxillary first permanent molars and association with other tooth and developmental disturbances. Eur J Orthod. 1992; 14:369-375 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.5.369
Baccetti T A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68:267-274
Hvaring CL, Øgaard B, Stenvik A, Birkeland K The prognosis of retained primary molars without successors: infraocclusion, root resorption and restorations in 111 patients. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 36:26-30 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjs105
Sidhu HK, Ali A Hypodontia, ankylosis and infraocclusion: report of a case restored with a fibre-reinforced ceromeric bridge. Br Dent J. 2001; 191:613-616 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801247
Adamson K The problem of impacted teeth in orthodontics. Aust J Dent. 1952; 56:74-84
Hua L, Thomas M, Bhatia S To extract or not to extract? Management of infraoccluded second primary molars without successors. Br Dent J. 2019; 227:93-98 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0207-9
Becker A, Karnei-R'em RM The effects of infraocclusion: part 1. Tilting of the adjacent teeth and local space loss. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 102:256-264 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81061-3
Becker A, Karnei-R'em RM, Steigman S The effects of infraocclusion: part 3. Dental arch length and the midline. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 102:427-433 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81189-8
Attwall R, Parker K, Gill DS Management of infra-occluded primary molars. Dent Update. 2018; 45:625-633
Teague AM, Barton P, Parry WJ Management of the submerged deciduous tooth: I. Aetiology, diagnosis and potential consequences. Dent Update. 1999; 26:292-296 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.1999.26.7.292
McGeown M, O'Connell A Management of primary molar infra-occlusion in general practice. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2014; 60:192-198
Messer LB, Cline JT Ankylosed primary molars: results and treatment recommendations from an eight-year longitudinal study. Pediatr Dent. 1980; 2:37-47
Brearley LJ, McKibben DH Ankylosis of primary molar teeth. I. Prevalence and characteristics. ASDC J Dent Child. 1973; 40:54-63
Kjaer I, Fink-Jensen M, Andreasen JO Classification and sequelae of arrested eruption of primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008; 18:11-17 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00886.x
Raghoebar GM, Boering G, Stegenga B, Vissink A Secondary retention in the primary dentition. ASDC J Dent Child. 1991; 58:17-22
Kokich VG, Kokich VO Congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: clinical options. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130:437-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.025
Kurol J, Thilander B Infraocclusion of primary molars and the effect on occlusal development, a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod. 1984; 6:277-293 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/6.4.277
Noble J, Karaiskos N, Wiltshire WA Diagnosis and management of the infraerupted primary molar. Br Dent J. 2007; 203:632-634 https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.1063

Infra-occluded primary molars: diagnosis and management

From Volume 16, Issue 2, April 2023 | Pages 85-90

Authors

Trishna Patel

MChD/BChD BSc, MFDS RCPS (Glasg), PGCert

Orthodontic Specialty Registrar 3, Derby and Sheffield

Articles by Trishna Patel

Email Trishna Patel

Catherine A Brierley

BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MClinDent, Orthodontic, Post-CCST

Sheffield and Chesterfield, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK

Articles by Catherine A Brierley

Abstract

Infra-occluded primary molars can be challenging in terms of their surgical management and potential sequelae. The prognosis of these teeth needs to considered allowing treatment planning for a stable long-term outcome for the patient. This article outlines the key principles to consider following a diagnosis of an infra-occluded primary molar, and it provides a management tool to aid decision making.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Timely diagnosis and management of infra-occluded primary molars is vital within the overall care pathway for these patients.

Article

Trishna Patel

Infra-occlusion is when a tooth has failed to maintain its occlusal level relative to adjacent teeth and is therefore found below the occlusal plane.1 In 1981, Kurol described infra-occlusion as when the occlusal surface of a tooth is 1 mm below the occlusal surface of a fully erupted adjacent tooth.2 The timely management of infra-occluded primary teeth avoids the need for more complex surgical management as well as allows planning for the resultant space. This article highlights the key principles behind management of such cases.

Incidence

The prevalence of infra-occluded primary molars ranges between 1% and 39%, with mandibular molars being much more affected than maxillary molars.2,3 The incidence is greater the older the patient, with infra-occlusion recorded from the age of 3 years suggesting a cumulative process.3 Bjerklin, however, demonstrated that there was little increase in infra-occlusion after the age of 20 years, suggesting primary molars after this age had a good long-term prognosis.4 There also appears to be equal frequency in males and females, as well as the site of occurrence.

Aetiology

Ankylosis is often suggested as the cause of the deciduous molar failing to maintain its occlusal position. Ankylosis occurs when the cementum of the tooth fuses with the adjacent alveolar bone, with resultant loss of the periodontal ligament space.2 Biederman described a possible genetic aetiology whereby there is a developmental gap in the periodontal membrane.5 This is supported by work carried out on siblings, which showed that the prevalence among siblings was 46% compared with 1.3% in the control group.6 Other theories propose excessive pressure from mastication or possibly trauma, as well as disturbances in local metabolism whereby the normal resorptive process is reversed so that the periodontal ligament is obliterated prior to root resorption.5 Other authors have discussed ankylosis in primary teeth being a transient process whereby the tooth would ‘re-erupt’ once the ankylosed portion of tooth had been resorbed.7

Prior studies have demonstrated associations between missing permanent successors and infra-occlusion, with 17% of cases of infra-occluded deciduous molars associated with missing permanent premolars.8,9 Hvaring et al found that infra-occlusion was the most important factor when considering the prognosis of retained primary teeth without successors.10 Exfoliation is often delayed by approximately 6 months in cases with a permanent successor, although this can be unpredictable and is sometimes significantly longer.11 Infra-occlusion has also been attributed to insufficient eruption force, occlusal trauma, infection and abnormal tongue pressure.1,12,13

Sequelae/complications

When a tooth infra-occludes, the adjacent teeth tip into the area with potential loss of space for the permanent successor (Figure 1a,b), which could also lead to centreline shifts (Figure 1c,d). Tipping with displacement of apices away from the infra-occluded tooth is thought to be related to changes in the direction of transeptal fibres.14 Becker noted the effect on the dental midline, showing a deviation to the affected side.15 The effect of transeptal fibres can also affect the vertical growth of adjacent teeth, resulting in lateral open bites or over-eruption of opposing teeth (Figure 2).16 Over-eruption and tipping have been shown to spontaneously correct in some cases once the permanent premolar erupts.1

Figure 1. (a,b) Severe infra-occlusion of LRE and ULE resulting in tipping of adjacent teeth. (c,d) Lower centreline shift likely due to asymmetric infra-occluded molar (LRE) and subsequent tipping.
Figure 2. Severe infra-occlusion resulting in a lateral open bite and tongue spreading.

The more severe an infra-occlusion, the more difficult extraction becomes, which is why the timing is important in management. If the tooth has infra-occluded and there has been little resorption of the roots (Figure 3), the teeth may require surgical removal involving sectioning.16 This is further complicated by the potential for ankylosis. Surgical removal can risk damage to adjacent teeth and structures, such as the mental nerve, or result in retained root fragments.17,18 Additionally, surgical removal often involves bone removal, which can affect future management options, such as orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and implant placement.16 This is also compounded by the observation that infra-occluded teeth have reduced bony development, affecting both the ridge width and height. The reduced alveolar bone development can hinder OTM and can complicate restorative intervention.13

Figure 3. Infra-occluded ULE and LRE with evidence of ankylosis. Vertical bony defect evident distal to LRE.

Infra-occluded teeth can result in food packing, reduced access for oral hygiene measures and, therefore, increased risk of caries and periodontal disease for the affected teeth as well as the adjacent teeth.18

Infra-occluded teeth may also cause impaction or ectopic eruption of permanent successors (Figure 4), which can worsen an individual's malocclusion and can increase the complexity of surgical and orthodontic treatment required.5,19

Figure 4. Impaction of a UL5 as a result of infra-occluded ULE.

Classification

There are a number of classification systems proposed in the literature to describe infra-occluded teeth. The most commonly recognized is that by Brearley:

  • Slight: occlusal surface approximately 1 mm below the predicted occlusal plane for that tooth (Figure 5).
  • Moderate: occlusal surface approximately level with the contact point of one/both adjacent teeth.
  • Severe: occlusal surface level with or below the interproximal gingivae of one or both adjacent tooth surfaces (Figure 1 a,b).20
  • Figure 5. Mild infra-occlusion of LRE.

    Another commonly cited classification system is that of Kjaer et al who used panoramic radiographic findings to assess the degree of infra-occlusion. The classification ranged from ‘Group I’ to ‘Group IV’, comparing the level of infra-occlusion to the full crown height of the tooth, with the most severe described as ‘deeply subgingival’.21

    Diagnosis

    Clinically, these teeth can present with a high percussion sound and may also be immobile, which could indicate ankylosis, although these indicators may be subjective.22

    Angular bony defects can be identified on radiographs (Figure 3) around infra-occluded teeth, although this may spontaneously correct with normal premolar eruption.23 Conventional radiographs provide limited information, and as ankylosis may only affect a small area of the root, CBCT may be indicated, particularly when combined with the need for assessment prior to surgical removal.13

    Treatment options

    Several factors need to be considered and these are outlined in Figure 6.

    Figure 6. Factors to consider in the management of infra-occluded deciduous teeth.

    Presence of a permanent successor

    In a patient with hypodontia in the permanent dentition, the deciduous tooth may not exfoliate normally and may be retained. Consideration needs to be given to whether treatment would involve retaining the deciduous tooth, with restorative input to maintain its function and position, or loss of the tooth and space closure. If the decision is taken to restore the tooth into occlusion for the short or long term, this could be carried with direct or indirect composite, ceramic or metal onlays, or preformed metal crowns.13

    Where there is a permanent successor, it has been reported that 96.7% of infra-occluded primary molars spontaneously exfoliate, although with a delay of approximately 6 months.24 If the infra-occluded molar has not naturally exfoliated within 6 months of the average expected time, then extraction of the submerged primary tooth should be undertaken. In these cases, the surgical risk to the unerupted permanent successor needs to be taken into account.

    Age of the patient and timing of diagnosis

    If, at the time of diagnosis, the patient has not yet passed the pubertal growth spurt, there is an increased chance that the infra-occlusion will worsen. For those who have already experienced the pubertal growth spurt, the rate of infra-occlusion is reduced.10

    Presence of pathology

    Hvaring et al found a significant relationship between root resorption and infra-occlusion, although root resorption was not considered to be critical to prognosis.10 A tooth with caries or an associated abscess should be extracted; however, if the space needs to be maintained, thought should be given to restoring the carious tooth.25

    Existing malocclusion

    In cases of mild infra-occlusion, without any obvious bony defects or ankylosis, retaining the infra-occluded tooth for as long as possible may be indicated to maintain bone and space for a prosthetic replacement where there is no permanent successor. Therefore, consideration of the long-term plan for a patient is vital before any treatment is initiated. When infra-occluded teeth have been extracted, space maintenance can be used in cases with a space requirement.16,18

    Extent of infra-occlusion

    For severely infra-occluded teeth, particularly in pre-pubertal patients, extraction is indicated.25 Similarly, moderately infra-occluded teeth in a pre-pubertal child are likely to undergo further infra-occlusion, and extraction would be recommended. Conversely, a tooth that has mild infra-occlusion, diagnosed in a non-growing patient, is likely to have better prognosis. Figure 7 shows retained lower deciduous second molars with good prognosis. Additionally, a mildly infra-occluded tooth in a pre-pubertal patient could benefit from regular monitoring, in the knowledge that any further infra-occlusion would require extraction of the affected tooth before the pubertal growth spurt, to reduce the risk of a vertical bony defect developing.13

    Figure 7. (a) Pre-treatment and mid-treatment OPT showing good prognosis LRE and LLE. (b) Pre-operative views of LRE and LLE. (c) LRE and LLE maintaining a good occlusal position during treatment.

    Patient cooperation

    Future orthodontic treatment may not be suitable for some patients and, therefore, extraction at the optimal time may be indicated. In addition, if looking to restore an infra-occluded tooth into function to maintain space, prevent over-eruption and prevent tipping, a patient needs to be able to cooperate to enable restorative intervention.

    Recommended management

    Space maintenance

    Space maintenance may need to be considered when an infra-occluded tooth has been extracted, but a space requirement has been identified. In some cases, it may be beneficial to use a space maintenance device, such as a band and loop (Figure 8).

    Figure 8. Band and loop cemented to UL6 to maintain space.

    Restorative management

    The aims of restoring the occlusal platform are to maintain contact points, prevent tipping of adjacent teeth over the occlusal surface of the infra-occluding molar, and to maintain occlusal contact with the opposing tooth.

    Restorative options when maintaining the tooth

    The occlusal height can be increased, and approximal contacts modified, with the use of direct/indirect composite addition, onlay or crown.18 There is, however, limited evidence in the literature for the prognosis and success of different treatment modalities or materials for this clinical scenario. Considerations to take into account include operator experience, moisture control, surface area available to bond, height of the restoration versus the amount of tooth visible, pulp horn size, pathology, previous restorations and patient cooperation.

    Tipping of adjacent teeth can compromise the prognosis for restoration more than the severity of the infra-occlusion. The undercuts created by the marginal ridges of adjacent teeth over the occlusal surface of the infra-occluded molar can interfere with interproximal placement of restoration margins and lead to voids or ledges. This reduces cleansability, leading to food packing, caries or loss of the restoration. Interproximal reduction of adjacent teeth can facilitate restoration, but there are risks for sensitivity and pulpal inflammation. As the degree of infra-occlusion becomes more severe, there is less tooth available for bonding, and the greater height of restorative material may also reduce prognosis.

    Restorative options when extraction is necessary

    If infra-occlusion is rapid, or tipping of adjacent teeth makes maintaining oral hygiene and restoring the tooth impossible, then extraction may be required, although the option of a dental implant may be limited if infra-occlusion or surgical extraction have led to reduced horizontal or vertical availability of alveolar bone.

    Resin-bonded or conventional bridgework may be feasible, but might require preparation of the adjacent tooth if tipping has occurred, to remove undercuts and optimise connector length. Orthodontic treatment can help to optimise the space for restoration.

    The flowchart in Figure 9 provides some guidance.

    Figure 9. Recommended management.

    Conclusion

    Considering all the relevant factors allows for optimal treatment planning and can aid in preventing future complications that can impact on restorative treatment options. The management of infra-occluded teeth is often multidisciplinary in nature, involving the general dental practitioner, restorative and oral surgery colleagues.

    Within the care pathway, orthodontic assessment is vital to fully assess the space requirement that plays a key role in the overall management.

    Early identification and accurate diagnosis of patients with infra-occluded primary molars is imperative for the timely and optimal management of these cases, particularly for those who can present with further complicating factors.