Kantor ML, Norton LA. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91:414-426
Tetradis S, Kantor ML. Prevalence of skeletal and dental anomalies and normal variants seen in cephalometric and other radiographs of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116:572-577
Moffitt AH. Discovery of pathologies by orthodontists on lateral cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81:58-63
Currarino G. Normal variants and congenital anomalies in the region of the obelion. Am J Roentgenol. 1976; 127:487-494
Lodge T. Developmental defects in the cranial vault. Br J Radiol. 1975; 48:421-434
Pang D, Lin A. Symptomatic large parietal foramina. Neurosurgery. 1982; 11:33-37
Wilkie AOM, Mavrogiannis LA. Enlarged parietal foramina. In: Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Stephens K (eds). Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 1993–2004
On the Catlin mark. Am Antiquity. 1949; 14:225-226
Wilkie AO, Tang Z, Elanko N, Walsh S, Twigg SR, Hurst JA, Wall SA, Chrzanowska KH, Maxson RE. Functional haploinsufficiency of the human homeobox gene MSX2 causes defects in skull ossification. Nat Genet. 2000; 24:387-390
Kortesis B, Richards T, David L, Glazier S, Argenta L. Surgical management of foramina parietalia permagna. J Craniofac Surg. 2003; 14:538-544
Mavrogiannis LA, Taylor IB, Davies SJ, Ramos FJ, Olivares JL, Wilkie AO. Enlarged parietal foramina caused by mutations in the homeobox genes ALX4 and MSX2: from genotype to phenotype. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006; 14:151-158
This is a case report of a 16-year-old girl referred to the oral and maxillofacial department for further assessment of a radiolucent area noted at the posterior aspect of the skull vertex on a lateral cephalogram by her orthodontist. Following assessment, these were diagnosed as enlarged parietal foramina and managed conservatively.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: With the increased use of the multiple imaging modalities available in dental practice, in particular the use of cone-beam CT imaging, the clinician should be familiar with the appearances of common pathology, as well as some incidental findings in the traditional dental and maxillofacial region, and adjacent territories. The careful review of medical imaging and referral for further evaluation of ambiguous incidental findings is recommended.
Article
A 16-year-old girl was referred to the oral and maxillofacial department by her orthodontist for further assessment of a radiolucent area noted at the posterior aspect of the skull vertex on a lateral cephalogram (Figure 1). The patient was a transfer case, with fixed appliances in place and the radiograph was taken as part of the clinical assessment of her further treatment needs.
The patient was asymptomatic, fit and healthy and had no past medical history of note. The mother reported an uneventful pregnancy, normal labour and vaginal delivery; no instrumentation was used during the second stage of labour.
On palpation, symmetrical depressions could be palpated through the scalp on either side of the sagittal midline just posterior to the skull vertex. Similar depressions could be palpated on the mother. A postero-anterior skull radiograph showed oval symmetrical radiolucent areas on the skull vertex within the parietal bones (Figure 2).
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: