References

Abdelkarim A, Jerrold L. Risk management strategies in orthodontics. Part 2: Administrative considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148:511-514
Benson PE, Shah AA, Millett DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralisation: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2005; 32:102-114
Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. Enamel demineralisation during orthodontic treatment. Aetiology and prevention. Aust Dent J. 1997; 42:322-327
Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138:188-194
Lundström F, Krasse B. Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli frequency in orthodontic patients; the effect of chlorhexidine treatments. Eur J Orthod. 1987; 9:109-116
Hadler-Olsen S, Sandvik K, El-Agroudi MA, Ogaard B. The incidence of caries and white spot lesions in orthodontically treated adolescents with a comprehensive caries prophylactic regimen – a prospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34:633-639
Richter AE, Arruda AO, Peters MC, Sohn W. Incidence of caries lesions among patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 13:657-664
Enaia M, Bock N, Ruf S. White-spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: a challenge for clinical excellence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:17-24
Mandall NA, Matthew S, Fox D, Wright J, Conboy FM, O'Brien KD. Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: are quality of life measures important?. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30:40-45
Moss JP, Williams DW, Cohen AM. Experience in providing orthodontic treatment in England. Eur J Orthod. 1981; 3:135-139
Cohen AM, Moss JP, Williams DW. Oral hygiene instruction prior to orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J. 1983; 155:277-278
London: Public Health England; 2014
Sjögren K, Birkhed D, Rangmar B. Effect of a modified toothpaste technique on approximal caries in preschool children. Caries Res. 1995; 29:435-441
Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3
Deery C, Heanue M, Deacon S The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for dental health: a systematic review. J Dent. 2004; 32:197-211
Leeds, UK: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2015
Eppright M, Shroff B, Best AM, Barcoma E, Lindauer SJ. Influence of active reminders on oral hygiene compliance in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84:208-213
Feil PH, Grauer JS, Gadbury-Amyot CC, Kula K, McCunniff MD. Intentional use of the Hawthorne effect to improve oral hygiene compliance in orthodontic patients. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66:1129-1135
Gray D, McIntyre G. Does oral health promotion influence the oral hygiene and gingival health of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment? A systematic literature review. J Orthod. 2008; 35:262-269
Harris R, Gamboa A, Dailey Y, Ashcroft A. One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006540.pub2
Benson PE, Parkin N, Dyer F, Millett DT, Furness S, Germain P. Fluorides for the prevention of early tooth decay (demineralised white lesions) during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003809.pub3
Stechksén-Blicks C, Renfors G, Oscarson ND, Bergstrand F, Twetman S. Caries-preventive effectiveness of fluoride varnish: a randomized controlled trial in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. Caries Res. 2007; 41:544-549
Øgaard B, Alm AA, Larsson E, Adolfsson U. A prospective, randomized clinical study on the effects of an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride toothpaste/mouthrinse on plaque, gingivitis and initial caries lesion development in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28:8-12
Luther F, Tobin M, Robertson AJ, Toumba KJ. Fluoride releasing glass beads in orthodontic treatment to reduce decay: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Wld J Orthod. 2005; 6:166-167
Tatsi C, Toumba KJ. Private communication. 2016;
Attin R, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference?. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010; 118:298-303
Wiechmann D, Klang E, Helms HJ, Knösel M. Lingual appliances reduce the incidence of white spot lesions during orthodontic multi-bracket treatment. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 14:414-422
Sonis AL, Snell W. An evaluation of a fluoride-releasing, visible light-activated bonding system for orthodontic bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 95:306-311
Tüfekçi E, Pennella DR, Mitchell JC, Best AM, Lindauer SJ. Efficacy of a fluoride-releasing orthodontic primer in reducing demineralisation around brackets: an in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146:207-214
Twetman S, McWilliam JS, Hallgren A, Oliveby A. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer retained orthodontic appliances. An in vivo study. Swed Dent J. 1997; 21:169-175
Marcusson A, Norevall LI, Persson M. White spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative study. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19:233-242
Chung CK, Millett DT, Creanor SL, Gilmour WH, Foye RH. Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding. J Dent. 1998; 26:533-538
Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralisation around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:10-14
Pascotto RC, Navarro MF, Capelozza Filho L, Cury JA. In vivo effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralisation around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125:36-41
Czochrowska E, Ogaard B, Duschner H, Ruben J, Arends J. Cariostatic effect of a light-cured, resin reinforced glass-ionomer for bonding orthodontic brackets in vivo. A combined study using microradiography and confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Orofac Orthop. 1998; 59:265-273
Millett DT, McCluskey LA, McAuley F, Creanor SL, Newell J, Love J. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:233-240
Gillgrass TJ, Benington PC, Millett DT, Newell J, Gilmour WH. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 120:49-53
Banks PA, Chadwick SM, Asher-McDade C, Wright JL. Fluoride-releasing elastomerics – a prospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22:401-407
Benham AW, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants in reducing white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79:338-345

Caries associated with orthodontic care part 1: aetiology, prevalence and prevention

From Volume 9, Issue 3, July 2016 | Pages 82-89

Authors

Maryam Vanat

BDS, MJDF RCS(Eng)

Dental Core Trainee, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield S10 2ZS, UK

Articles by Maryam Vanat

Amy Hyde

BDS, MFDS RCPS(Glas)

Specialty Registrar in Orthodontics, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK

Articles by Amy Hyde

Abstract

The prevalence of demineralization, or enamel caries which is the first clinically recognizable stage of caries, has been reported to be as high as 73% during fixed appliance treatment. It is recognized that wearing an orthodontic appliance increases the caries risk of the individual. The orthodontist can effectively reduce demineralization by applying fluoride varnish at each visit. Selecting patients on their oral hygiene clearly is one factor which can prevent patients suffering from demineralization. Excellent home care with optimal use of fluoride will also help prevent the condition. There is little evidence that fluoride-releasing materials used for bonding orthodontic appliances offer protection from demineralization. The first of these two papers describes the aetiology, prevalence and prevention of demineralization associated with orthodontic care. The second paper will describe the treatments available to manage caries focusing on demineralization post orthodontic treatment.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Demineralization is the most common complication of orthodontic care. The clinician should understand how to prevent this.

Article

Orthodontic care involves the practitioner in an assessment of a number of risks and benefits. It would be inappropriate to continue treatment when unexpected complications, poor patient compliance or behaviour leads to detrimental effects for the patient as a result of orthodontic treatment.1 One of the most commonly recognized complications of orthodontic care is demineralization due to poor oral hygiene. Demineralization is enamel caries and is the first clinically recognizable stage of caries. Although such lesions can develop irrespective of orthodontic treatment, it has been shown to be a recognized complication of orthodontic treatment.2

Introducing fixed or removable orthodontic appliances to the oral environment alters the ecology of the mouth by adding another variable to the system. Figure 1 shows a proposed hypothesis suggested by Chang et al of the influences orthodontic appliances may have on the process of enamel demineralization.3

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available