Abstract
This paper will give an update on recent developments in aesthetic archwires, brackets and accessories that are presently available to increase the options available for the provision of an aesthetic labial orthodontic fixed appliance.
References
Bergstrom K, Halling A, Wilde B Orthodontic care from the patient's perspective: perceptions of 27 yr olds. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20:319-329
Lim KF, Lew KKK, Toh SL Bending stiffness of two aesthetic orthodontic archwires: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Mater. 1994; 16:63-71
Husmann P, Bourauel C, Wessinger M, Jäger A The frictional behaviour of coated guiding archwires. J Orofac Orthop. 2002; 63:199-211
Neumann P, Bourauel C, Jäger A Corrosion and permanent fracture resistance of coated and conventional orthodontic wires. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002; 13:141-147
Dickson JA, Jones SP, Davis EH A comparison of the frictional characteristics of five initial alignment wires and stainless steel brackets at three bracket to wire angulations - an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1994; 21:15-22
Talass MF Orthodontic archwire.
Talass MF Optiflex archwire treatment of a skeletal class III open bite. J Clin Orthod. 1992; 4:245-252
Ireland AJ, Sherriff M, McDonald F Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces. Eur J Orthod. 1991; 13:322-328
Watari F, Yamagata S, Imai I, Nakamura S The fabrication and properties of aesthetic FRP wires for use in orthodontics. J Mater Sci. 1998; 33:5661-5664
Rollins DA The potential application of fibre-reinforced composite as an orthodontic wire: biomechanical considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 98:560-561
Patel AP A study on the changes in mechanical properties and structure of fibre-reinforced composite wires as a result of thermoforming. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 100:193-194
Jancar J, Dibenedetto AT, Hadziinikolau Y, Goldberg AJ, Dianselmo A Measurement of the elastic modulus of fibre-reinforced composite used as orthodontic wires. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1994; 5:214-218
Kennedy KC, Kusy RP UV-cured pultrusion processing of glass-reinforced polymer composites. J Vinyl Addit Technol. 1995; 1:182-186
Kennedy KC, Kusy RP Pultruded fibre-reinforced plastic and related apparatus and method.
Imai T, Watari F, Yamagata S Mechanical properties and aesthetics of FRP orthodontic wire fabricated by hot drawing. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:2195-2200
Fallis DW, Kusy RP Variation in flexural properties of photo-pultruded composite archwires: analyses of round and rectangular profiles. J Mater Sci. 2000; 11:683-693
Huang ZM, Gopal R, Fujihara K Fabrication of a new composite orthodontic archwire and validation by a bridging micromechanics model. Biomaterials. 2003; 24:2941-2953
Zufall SW, Kennedy KC, Kusy RP Frictional characteristics of composite orthodontic archwires against stainless steel and ceramic brackets in the passive and active configuration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998; 9:611-620
Newman GV Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965; 51:901-912
Brandt S JCO interviews Dr Elliott Silverman, Dr Morton Cohen, and Dr A. J. Gwinnett on bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1979; 13:236-251
Birnie D Orthodontic material update: ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod. 1990; 17:71-75
Garcia-Godoy F, Martin S Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel. J Clin Ped Dent. 1995; 19:181-185
Keith O, Kusy RP, Whitley JQ Zirconia brackets: an evaluation of morphology and coefficients of friction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106:605-614
Summary of the AAO ceramic bracket survey. Bull Am Assoc Orthod. 1989; 7
In: West-brook JH, Conrad H US: ASM; 1973
Buzzitta VA, Hallgren SE, Powers JM Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81:87-92
Ghafari J Problems associated with ceramic brackets suggest limiting use to selected teeth. Angle Orthod. 1997; 62:145-152
Odegaard J, Segner D Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94:201-206
Viazis AD, Cavanaugh G, Boris RR Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98:214-221
Franklin S, Garcia-Godoy F Shear bond strengths and effects on enamel of two ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1993; 27:83-88
Mundstock KS, Sadowsky PL, Lacefield W, Bae S An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116:635-641
Schwartz M Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1988; 22:82-88
Reynolds IR A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975; 2:171-175
Newman GV Clinical treatment with bonded plastic attachments. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60:600-610
Bayne SC Dental biomaterials: where are we and where are we going?. J Dent Educ. 2005; 69:571-585
Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craig RGMosby: Elsevier; 2006
Feldner JC, Sarkar NK, Sheridan JJ, Lancaster DM In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of orthodontic polycarbonate brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106:265-272
Harzer W, Bourauel C, Gmyrek H Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26:435-441
Sadat-Khonsari R, Moshtaghy A, Schelgel V, Kahl-Nieke B, Moller M, Bauss O Torque deformation characteristics of plastic brackets: a comparative study. J Orofac Orthop. 2004; 65:26-33
Bazakidou E, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Sinha PK Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112:138-144
Kusy RP, Whitley JQ Degradation of plastic polyoxymethylene brackets and the subsequent release of toxic formaldehyde. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127:420-427
De Franco DJ, Spiller RE, von Fraunhofer JA Frictional resistance using teflon coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65:63-67
Edwards GD, Davis EH, Jones SP The Ex Vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires. Br J Orthod. 1995; 22:145-153
Aesthetic labial orthodontic appliances – an update
From Volume 4, Issue 3, July 2011 | Pages 70-77
Article
The demand for orthodontic treatment among adult patients has steadily increased in recent years and, despite greater acceptance of conventional fixed appliances, the quest for a less visible alternative has driven the development of aesthetic orthodontic appliances. This has included developments in labial aesthetic brackets, archwires and accessories, along with lingual appliances and clear aligners such as Invisalign. Although a study carried out in Sweden found that, if treatment were needed, 67% of 27-year-olds would probably or definitely wear metal braces, the study highlighted the fact that nearly a third of those interviewed would not wear visible braces even when there is a clinical need.1 This clearly illustrates the potential market for an aesthetic alternative to conventional labially placed stainless steel appliances. The intention of this review is to update the reader on recent developments in labial aesthetic orthodontic appliances and to highlight the limitations of the currently available materials and products. Labial aesthetic appliances and materials can be classified under three main headings, which will be discussed in turn, namely:
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
- Up to 2 free articles per month
- New content available